Frieson v. Martuscello Jr.

Frieson v. Martuscello Jr.

Petitioner:	Phillip Frieson
Respondent:	Daniel F. Martuscello Jr.
Case Number:	1:2011cv00168
Filed:	January 4, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Greene
Presiding Judge:	P. Kevin Castel
Presiding Judge:	Andrew J. Peck
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 3, 2012	Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 21 Report and Recommendations. The R&R is well reasoned, well grounded in fact and in law and, upon de novo review, it is adopted. The Clerk shall enter judgment for respondent. Petition er has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, accordingly, a certificate ofappealability will not issue. This Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.c. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and in forma pauperis status is denied. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 4/3/2012) (laq)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 3, 2012

Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 21 Report and Recommendations. The R&R is well reasoned, well grounded in fact and in law and, upon de novo review, it is adopted. The Clerk shall enter judgment for respondent. Petition er has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, accordingly, a certificate ofappealability will not issue. This Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.c. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and in forma pauperis status is denied. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 4/3/2012) (laq)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frieson v. Martuscello Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Phillip Frieson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Daniel F. Martuscello Jr.
Represented By:	Nancy Darragh Killian
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?