Applestein et al v. The United States of America et al
| Allan H. Applestein, George R. Marks, Harold Schwartz, Rosenman Family, LLC, Robert I. Lappin and Daniel Silna |
| The United States of America and John Does 1-10 |
| 1:2011cv00521 |
| January 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 15 Motion to Vacate. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motion is denied and the Court's judgment dismissing this case for lack of jurisdiction stands. This Memorandum Order resolves docket entry no. 51. The parallel applications in the related cases are also denied. The Clerk of Court is requested to enter this Memorandum Order in the following twenty-seven additional actions: 10 Civ. 2483, 10 Civ. 2484, 10 Civ. 7367, 10 Civ. 8331, 10 Civ. 8348, 10 Civ. 8349, 10 Civ. 8619, 10 Civ. 8887, 10 Civ. 8888, 10 Civ. 9213, 11 Civ. 0521, 11 Civ. 0890, 11 Civ. 1131, 11 Civ. 1250, 11 Civ. 1251, 11 Civ. 1252, 11 Civ. 1370, 11 Civ. 1447, 11 Civ. 1448, 11 Civ. 1449, 11 Civ. 1450, 11 Civ. 1557, 11 Civ. 1629, 11 Civ. 1673, 11 Civ. 2312, 11 Civ. 2313, and 11 Civ. 2316. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 1/24/2012) (mro) Modified on 1/24/2012 (mro).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
