Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. ED. Geistlich Sohne A.G. Fur Chemische Industrie et al
| Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
| ED. Geistlich Sohne A.G. Fur Chemische Industrie and Osteomedical LTD. |
| 1:2011cv00681 |
| February 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Suffolk |
| Richard J. Holwell |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
415
OPINION & ORDER re: 349 MOTION in Limine Number 5 to Exclude the Testimony and Rebuttal Report of Gary Frazier. filed by Osteomedical LTD., ED. Geistlich Sohne A.G. Fur Chemische Industrie, 346 MOTION in Limine Number 4 to Exclude the Testimony and Rebuttal Report of Joseph Floyd. filed by Osteomedical LTD., ED. Geistlich Sohne A.G. Fur Chemische Industrie, 330 MOTION in Limine NUMBER 1 TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANTS EXPERT WITNESS MARTIN DYMEK . filed by Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 352 MOTION in Limine Number 6 to Require an Offer of Proof Regarding Potentially Duplicative Expert Reports and Testimony. filed by Osteomedical LTD., ED. Geistlich Sohne A.G. Fur Che mische Industrie, 361 MOTION in Limine re MILs 3, 4, and 5. filed by Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 343 MOTION in Limine Number 3 to Exclude the Testimony and Rebuttal Reports of Joel W. Hay Ph.D.. filed by Osteomedic al LTD., ED. Geistlich Sohne A.G. Fur Chemische Industrie, 358 MOTION in Limine No. 2 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE FROM EXPERT MICHELE M. RILEY. filed by Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 337 MOTION in Limine Number 1 to Exclude Boar d Minutes Material. filed by Osteomedical LTD., ED. Geistlich Sohne A.G. Fur Chemische Industrie. After several years of litigation, this action is set for trial commencing on September 21, 2015. The parties have filed a total of 11 motions i n limine. Several of the motions argue that certain evidence is irrelevant, misleading, or would waste time, and certain are directed at the qualifications of proposed experts or the reliability of their opinions. The Court's rulings are as further set forth in this order. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 9/16/2015) (lmb)
|
|
Filing
233
MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting 227 Motion to Seal Document. ENDORSEMENT: So ordered. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 6/8/2015) (lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
