Glaves-Morgan v. The City of New York et al
| Sandra Glaves-Morgan |
| The City of New York, Robert Doar, Thomas Depippo, John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 1:2011cv01248 |
| February 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Harold Baer |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
OPINION ON MOTION TO RECONSIDER AND AMENDMENT OF MARCH 21,2012 OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' request for reconsideration is GRANTED. This Opinion and Order amends and modifies the March 21 Order to the extent set out above. (Signed by Judge Harold Baer on 4/1/2012) (cd)
|
|
Filing
34
OPINION AND ORDER re: 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment. filed by Robert Doar, The City of New York, Thomas Depippo, 24 MOTION for Sanctions Pursuant to FRCP Rule 37. filed by Sandra Glaves-Morgan. The Court has considered Defendants' ad ditional arguments and finds them without merit. The motion for sanctions is DENIED. The motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to claims against the City and the individual defendants in their official capacity and as to the § 1981 claim for retaliation. The motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to all other claims, including the § 1981 claim for discrimination against the individual defendants in their personal capacity. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to close the motions. (Signed by Judge Harold Baer on 3/21/2012) (jfe)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
