Genon Mid-Atlantic, LLC et al v. Stone & Webster, Inc.
| Genon Mid-Atlantic, LLC and Genon Chalk Point, LLC |
| Stone & Webster, Inc. |
| Genon Mid-Atlantic, LLC and Genon Chalk Point, LLC |
| Stone & Webster, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv01299 |
| February 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Harold Baer |
| Frank Maas |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
269
OPINION AND ORDER. I have considered the parties' remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. For the foregoing reasons, Judge Maas' Order is affirmed. (Signed by Judge Harold Baer on 5/21/2012) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
201
OPINION AND ORDER: I have considered the Parties' remaining arguments and find them without merit. Shaw's Motion to Strike the McGeehin Declaration is DENIED. GenOn's Motion to Strike the Ranallo Declaration is GRANTED. Siemens' M otion to Strike the Monte Declaration is DENIED. GenOn's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED as to whether Shaw satisfied the conditions precedent to final payment and as to whether Shaw is entitled to payment of its alleged costs from the Contingency fund and is GRANTED to the extent that Shaw cannot recover amounts associated with delays attributed to GenOn prior to the date of Amendment 2. Shaw's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED in its entirety. Siemens' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close these six open motions and remove them from my docket. re: 186 MOTION to Strike Document No. 160 Declaration of Lawrence F. Ranallo. filed by Genon Mid-Atlantic, LLC, Genon Chalk Point, LLC, 166 MOTION to Strike Document No. 152 . filed by Siemens Water Technologies Corporation, 146 MOTION to Strike Document No. 139 Exhibit 9, Declaration of Patrick A. McGeehin. filed by Stone & Webster, Inc., 134 MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice and Motion. filed by Genon Mid-Atlantic, LLC, Genon Chalk Point, LLC, 129 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. filed by Stone & Webster, Inc., 125 MOTION for Summary Judgment. filed by Siemens Water Technologies Corporation. (Signed by Judge Harold Baer on 4/18/2012) (jfe)
|
|
Filing
124
OPINION & ORDER: GenOn's letter motion to find Document E0015714607 not privileged is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Harold Baer on 12/5/2011) (ft)
|
|
Filing
55
OPINION AND ORDER re: 22 MOTION to Quash Subpoena of FTI, Inc. or in the Alternative for Protective Order, filed by Genon Chalk Point, LLC and Genon Mid-Atlantic, LLC; 28 MOTION to Compel for Attorneys Fees and to Disqualify, filed by Stone & Web ster, Inc.; 36 MOTION to Comply with 4/8/2011 Order, filed by Genon Chalk Point, LLC and Genon Mid-Atlantic, LLC. For the reasons set forth herein, Stone & Webster will proceed in accordance with this discussion and the relevant scheduling orders; GenOn's motion to quash or for a protective order is DENIED; Stone & Webster's motion to compel is GRANTED; and Stone & Webster's motion to disqualify is DENIED. The parties are directed to appear for a status conference on 6/28/2011 a t 4:30 PM to ensure that discovery is proceeding in a manner consistent with the Order and this Opinion. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the relevant motions (docket numbers 22, 28 and 36) and remove them from my docket. (Signed by Judge Harold Baer on 6/6/2011) (ab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
