Nardino Colotti v. United States of America

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Nardino Colotti v. United States of America

Nardino Colotti v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Nardino Colotti
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	1:2011cv01402
Filed:	February 28, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	Denise L. Cote
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 29, 2021	Filing 28 OPINION AND ORDER: The October 19, 2020 petition for § 2255 relief is denied. But since the issues raised by Petitioners are those "that reasonable jurists could debate," Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003), a certificate of appealability is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 3/29/2021) (jca) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
April 4, 2012	Filing 21 OPINION AND ORDER. For the forgoing reasons, the three petitions are denied in their entirety. In addition, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability as to Ivezaj, Dedaj or Colotti. The petitioners have not made a substantial showing of a denial of a federal right, and appellate review is therefore not warranted. Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). The Court also finds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal by the petitioners from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 4/4/2012) (lmb)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 29, 2021

Filing 28 OPINION AND ORDER: The October 19, 2020 petition for § 2255 relief is denied. But since the issues raised by Petitioners are those "that reasonable jurists could debate," Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003), a certificate of appealability is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 3/29/2021) (jca) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

April 4, 2012

Filing 21 OPINION AND ORDER. For the forgoing reasons, the three petitions are denied in their entirety. In addition, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability as to Ivezaj, Dedaj or Colotti. The petitioners have not made a substantial showing of a denial of a federal right, and appellate review is therefore not warranted. Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). The Court also finds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal by the petitioners from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 4/4/2012) (lmb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nardino Colotti v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By:	Jennifer Gillum Rodgers
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Nardino Colotti
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?