Hoff v. WPIX, Inc. et al
| Larry Hoff |
| Tribune Company, Betty Ellen Berlamino and WPIX, Inc. |
| Karen Scott |
| Betty Ellen Berlamino, WPIX, Inc. and Tribune Company |
| 1:2011cv01591 |
| March 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Leonard B. Sand |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: denying 32 Motion to Dismiss. Before the Court is Third-Party Defendant WPIX, Inc.'s ("WPIX") motion to dismiss Third-Party Defendant Karen Scott's ADEA (29 U.S.C. § 623(d)), NYHRL (New York Exec. Law § 296(7)), and NYCHRL (New York City Admin. Code § 8-107(7)) retaliation claims. The relevant facts and legal arguments are discussed in our memorandum and order deciding a nearly identical motion in the Marchiano v. Berlamino case, which we have also released today. For the reasons stated in that memorandum and order, WPIX's motion is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 9/20/2012) (jfe)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: For the reasons provided in the foregoing opinion, Defendant's motion to dismiss the Third-Party Complaint is denied. (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 10/11/2011) (ft)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Defendant's motion to dismiss the Third-Party Complaint is denied. (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 10/11/2011) (ft)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
