Tasini et al v. AOL, Inc. et al
| Jonathan Tasini |
| AOL, Inc., The HuffingtonPost.com, Inc., Arianna Huffington and Kenneth Lerer |
| 1:2011cv02472 |
| April 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
OPINION AND ORDER. The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, the remaining arguments are either moot or without merit. For the reasons explained above, the defendants' mo tion to dismiss is granted on both claims. The First Amended Class Action Complaint is therefore dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment, to close this case, and to close all pending motions. Re: 23 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Class Action Complaint filed by AOL, Inc., The HuffingtonPost.com, Inc., Kenneth Lerer, Arianna Huffington. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/30/2012) (rjm)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AOL, Inc., Arianna Huffington, Kenneth Lerer, The HuffingtonPost.com, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 3797)Document filed by Jonathan Tasini(individually), Jonathan Tasini(on behalf of all others similarly situated).(laq) (Entered: 04/13/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
