Katz v. Adecco USA, Inc. et al
| Barbara Katz |
| Adecco USA, Inc. and Savoy Capital, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv02540 |
| April 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Harold Baer |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
OPINION AND ORDER re: 38 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Barbara Katz, 48 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Savoy Capital, Inc., 42 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Adecco USA, Inc. Plaintiff's motion for partial summa ry judgment is DENIED and Adecco's motion forsummary judgment is DENIED. Savoy Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff's First and Fourth causes of action, alleging violations of the ADA, are dismissed with prejudice; it is DENIED in all other respects. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the three open motions and remove them from my docket. (Signed by Judge Harold Baer on 1/10/2012) (lmb)
|
|
Filing
29
OPINION AND ORDER: Savoy's motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this Order to conclude discovery limited to the issue of whether Savoy employed the requisite number of employees. Savoy may renew its motion upon the completion of the 30 day discovery period. (Signed by Judge Harold Baer on 6/16/2011) (jpo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
