Eastman Chemical Company v. Nestle Waters Management & Technology

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Eastman Chemical Company v. Nestle Waters Management & Technology

Eastman Chemical Company v. Nestle Waters Management & Technology

Plaintiff:	Eastman Chemical Company
Defendant:	Nestle Waters Management & Technology
Case Number:	1:2011cv02589
Filed:	April 15, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Victor Marrero
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 1, 2014	Filing 136 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, Nestle's objections are denied and Judge Pitman's Order denying Nestle's motion to amend is affirmed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 4/1/2014) (ja)
September 28, 2012	Filing 49 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Nestle Waters Management & Technology. Eastman Chemical Company (Eastman) brings this action asserting three counts of breach of contract against defendant Nes tle Waters Management & Technology (Nestle). Nestle and Eastman entered into two contracts (the Contracts) for the supply of resin by Eastman to Nestle. For the foregoing reasons, this Court adopts Magistrate Judge Pitman's Report in its entiret y. Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dk. No. 27) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. That motion is granted to the extent that Plaintiff's third cause of action based on Nestle's failure to place orders for PS 2800 in January 2011 is dismissed. The motion is denied with respect to the first and second causes of action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/28/2012) (ja)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 1, 2014

Filing 136 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, Nestle's objections are denied and Judge Pitman's Order denying Nestle's motion to amend is affirmed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 4/1/2014) (ja)

September 28, 2012

Filing 49 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Nestle Waters Management & Technology. Eastman Chemical Company (Eastman) brings this action asserting three counts of breach of contract against defendant Nes tle Waters Management & Technology (Nestle). Nestle and Eastman entered into two contracts (the Contracts) for the supply of resin by Eastman to Nestle. For the foregoing reasons, this Court adopts Magistrate Judge Pitman's Report in its entiret y. Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dk. No. 27) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. That motion is granted to the extent that Plaintiff's third cause of action based on Nestle's failure to place orders for PS 2800 in January 2011 is dismissed. The motion is denied with respect to the first and second causes of action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/28/2012) (ja)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eastman Chemical Company v. Nestle Waters Management & Technology
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nestle Waters Management & Technology
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eastman Chemical Company
Represented By:	Kristina M. Allen
Represented By:	Marshall Beil
Represented By:	Meghan Elizabeth Silhan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?