Grenawalt et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
| Julio Alisea, John Grenawalt and Carlos Miranda |
| AT&T Mobility LLC, Alpha-Omega Protection Services Corp., Grace M. DePompo, Gladius, Inc. and Centuria, Inc. |
| Centuria, Inc. and Gladius Protection, Inc. |
| Alpha-Omega Protection Services Corp. and Grace M. DePompo |
| 1:2011cv02664 |
| April 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| Richard M. Berman |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
207
OPINION & ORDER re: 197 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Julio Alisea, John Grenawalt, Carlos Miranda. For the reasons stated above, Plaintiffs' Motion (ECF No. 197) is GRANTED as to class certification, while it is DENIED as to summary judgment for the reasons stated on the record at the September 19, 2014 status conference. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 9/29/2014) (ama)
|
|
Filing
182
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER: AT&T's motion for summary judgment dismissing Plaintiff's FLSA and NYLL claims (Dkt. No. 165) is GRANTED. AT&T's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's NYLL claims on jurisdictional grounds ( Dkt. No. 165) is DE NIED as moot. Gladius and Centuria's motions to compel arbitration and dismiss the complaint (Dkt. Nos. 169,171) are GRANTED. Gladius's cross-motions for summary judgment against the A-O Defendant and against Plaintiffs are DENIED as these claims will be decided in arbitration. A-O's cross-claims against Gladius are dismissed without prejudice. As to their third-party beneficiary status and successor-in-interest liability claims against Gladius and Centuria, respectively, Plaintif fs' motions for summary judgment against Gladius and Centuria (Dkt. No. 150) are DENIED as these claims will be decided in arbitration. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment against AT&T is DENIED. Plaintiffs' motion for class certif ication as to AT&T, Gladius and Centuria is DENIED as moot. If desired, Plaintiffs may renew their motion for class certification and motion for summary judgment for classwide damages against Grace DePomp in her individual capacity, upon proof of service. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 4/2/2013) (Attachments: # 1 Opinion)(rsh)
|
|
Filing
181
OPINION AND ORDER: AT&T's motion for summary judgment dismissing Plaintiffs' FLSA and NYLL claims (Dkt. NO. 165) is GRANTED. AT&T's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' NYLL claims on jurisdictional grounds (Dkt. No. 165) is DENIED as mo ot. Gladius and Centuria's motions to compel arbitration and dismiss the complaint(Dkt. Nos. 169,171) are GRANTED. Gladius's cross-motions for summary judgment against the A-O Defendants and against Plaintiffs are DENIED as these claims wil l be decided in arbitration. A-O's cross -claims against Gladius are dismissed without prejudice. As to their third-party beneficiary status and successor-in-interest liability claims against Gladius and Centuria, respectively, Plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 150) are DENIED as these claims will be decided in arbitration. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment against AT&T is DENIED. Plaintiffs' motion for class certification is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case and to enter judgment in accordance with this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 3/28/2013) (Attachments: # 1 part 2)(rsh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
