Tonks v. USA
Petitioner: George Bing Tonks
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 1:2011cv02687
Filed: April 15, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Paul A Crotty
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MANDATE of USCA (Certified Copy) as to #13 Notice of Appeal filed by George Bing Tonks USCA Case Number 12-4791. Appellant, pro se, moves for a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions are DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED because appellant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c); see also Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003). Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Issued As Mandate: 4/24/2013. (tp)
April 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Transmission of USCA Mandate/Order to the District Judge re: #15 USCA Mandate. (tp)
December 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Request for Copies/Transcripts/Docket Sheet Received: Request for docket sheet from George Bing Tonks received on 12/05/12. Request for Copies/Transcripts/Docket Sheet Mailed: Request for docket sheet from George Bing Tonks mailed on 12/05/12. (vn)
November 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for #4 Order to Answer, 3 Screening Memo to Judge, #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by George Bing Tonks, #7 Reply filed by George Bing Tonks, #9 Memorandum & Opinion, #2 Standing Order - In Forma Pauperis, #13 Notice of Appeal filed by George Bing Tonks, #12 Docket Annotation, #5 Endorsed Letter, Set Deadlines, #8 Pro Se Memorandum to Change Address filed by George Bing Tonks, #10 Clerk's Judgment, #6 Endorsed Letter, Set Deadlines, #11 Pro Se Memorandum to Change Address filed by George Bing Tonks were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (tp)
November 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #13 Notice of Appeal. (tp)
November 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 DOCKET ANNOTATION: In light of the letter received on 11/20/12, a copy of the 10/17/12 Opinion and Order was mailed by chambers to: George Bing Tonks Reg# 09650-424 FCI - McKean P.O. Box 8000 Bradford, PA 16701. (mov)
November 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Appeal Remark as to #13 Notice of Appeal filed by George Bing Tonks. $455.00 APPEAL FEE DUE. IFP REVOKED 10/17/2012. REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE OF APPEAL. COA DENIED 10/17/2012. (tp)
November 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEAL from #9 Memorandum & Opinion, #10 Clerk's Judgment. Document filed by George Bing Tonks. Form D-P is due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. (tp)
October 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Mailed notice of Right to Appeal re: #10 Clerk's Judgment, to Pro Se Litigant(s): George Bing Tonks. (jab)
October 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PRO SE MEMORANDUM dated 10/23/2012 re: CHANGE OF ADDRESS for George Bing Tonks. New Address: FCI McKean, P.O. Box 8000, Bradford, PA, 16707. (js)
October 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated October 17, 2012, Tonk's Section 2255 petition for relief is denied; the Court finds that because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue; the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Opinion and Order dated October 17, 2012 would not be taken in good faith; accordingly, the case closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 10/18/12) (Attachments: #1 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL)(ml)
October 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #10 Clerk's Judgment,, to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (ml)
October 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 OPINION & ORDER: For the reasons above, Tonks' Section 2255 petition for relief is DENIED. Since Tonks has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. 28 U.S.C. 2253. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and terminate this case. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 10/17/2012) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (djc)
October 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Transmission to Judgments and Orders Clerk. Transmitted re: #9 Memorandum & Opinion, to the Judgments and Orders Clerk. (djc)
June 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PRO SE MEMORANDUM dated 6/15/2012 re: CHANGE OF ADDRESS for George Bing Tonks. New Address: 09650-424, FCI-McKean, P.O. Box 8000, Bradford, PA, 16701. (lmb)
May 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Request for Copies/Transcripts/Docket Sheet Received: Request for Docket Sheet from George Bing Tonks received on May 7, 2012. Request for Copies/Transcripts/Docket Sheet Mailed: Request for Docket Sheet from George Bing Tonks mailed on May 21, 2012. (vn)
May 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Request for Copies/Transcripts/Docket Sheet Received: Request for Docket Sheet from George Bing Tonks received on May 4, 2012. Request for Copies/Transcripts/Docket Sheet Mailed: Request for Docket Sheet from George Bing Tonks mailed on May 14, 2012. (vn)
October 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PETITIONER'S REPLY TO GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE. Document filed by George Bing Tonks. (pl)
September 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Paul A. Crotty from George Tonks dated 9/8/2011 re: Petitioner requests a 30-day extension, until October 30, 2011, to reply to the Government's brief. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. ( Replies due by 10/30/2011.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 9/13/2011) (djc)
August 26, 2011 Opinion or Order MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255). Document filed by USA. [*** NOTE: Original document filed in related Criminal Case 06-cr-771(PAC), see doc.#99. ***] (bw)
June 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Paul A. Crotty from Shane T. Stansbury dated 6/16/2011 re: The Government writes to request a 60-day extension, until 8/26/2011, to respond to the petitioners 2255 motion. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 8/26/2011) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 6/16/2011) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ab)
April 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Mailed a copy of #4 Order to Answer, #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) to United States Attorney's Office SDNY by Certified Mail # 7001 2510 0008 7682 3356 with Return Receipt Requested. (eef)
April 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO ANSWER re: Movant's Motion to vacate his sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. It is ORDERED that the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York shall file an answer or other pleadings in response to the Motion, along with transcripts of any relevant proceedings not already contained in the record, within 60 days of the date of this Order. Movant may file reply papers, if any, no later than 30 days thereafter. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court serve copies of this Order, the Motion and all other papers in support thereof, by certified mail upon the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 4/27/2011) The Clerks Office Has Mailed Copies. Copies Mailed by Chambers. (ab)
April 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #4 Order to Answer, to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (ab)
April 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 2 DUPLICATE ORIGINAL STANDING ORDER (IN THE MATTER OF PRO SE PETITIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS). All pro se petitions for writs of habeas corpus, whether brought under 28 U.S.C. 2241, 2254 or 2255, shall be deemed to include a petition for leave to appear in forma pauperis and the Clerk of Court is directed to file all such petitions as if in forma pauperis status had been granted without prepayment of fees. (See M-10-468 Order Filed January 10, 2000) (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 01/10/2000) (bl)
April 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (laq)
April 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (28 U.S.C. 2255) NO FURTHER ENTRIES. PLEASE SEE CRIMINAL CASE: 06-cr-771 (PAC) Document filed by George Bing Tonks.(jw) (msa).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tonks v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: George Bing Tonks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?