United States of America ex rel. John and Jane Doe v. The Taconic Hills Central School District et al.
| United States of America ex rel. John and Jane Doe |
| The New York State School Districts, New York City Department of Education, The Taconic Hills Central School District, The Auburn Enlarged City School District, The Mexico Central School District and The Greene Central School District |
| 1:2011cv02699 |
| April 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Paul A. Crotty |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
OPINION & ORDER: Accordingly, the Court severs the claims against each Defendant and dismisses the claims against the Upstate Defendants without prejudice for improper venue. Transfer of these claims to the Northern District of New York is not warran ted under 28 U.S.c. § 1406(a) andtherefore the Court declines to do so. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), the Court also dismisses the claims against the DOE without prejudice. The Upstate Defendants' motion is GRANTED and the DOE's motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and to terminate this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on March 25, 2014) (mov)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
