Hooks et al v. Forman, Holt, Elaides & Ravin, LLC et al
| Karen Hooks and Geraldine Moore |
| Forman, Holt, Elaides & Ravin, LLC and William L. Waldman |
| 1:2011cv02767 |
| April 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Richard J. Holwell |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
OPINION AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART Plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment [dkt. no. 66], insofar as it finds (1) the Notice constituted an attempt to collect debt within the meaning of the FDCPA and (2) Defendant is a debt collector as defined by the Act. However, the Court finds that Plaintiffs are not entitled to "additional" damages. Accordingly, Defendant's corresponding motion for summary judgment [dkt. no. 59] is DENIED. The Cl erk of Court shall terminate those motions [dkt. nos. 59, 66], and mark any pending motions denied as moot. Counsel shall confer and inform the Court by letter no later than September 21, 2015 how they propose to proceed. re: 66 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment Of Plaintiffs filed by Geraldine Moore, Karen Hooks, 59 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Forman, Holt, Elaides & Ravin, LLC. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 9/14/2015) (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
