Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Tredegar Corporation

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Tredegar Corporation

Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Tredegar Corporation

Plaintiff:	Exxon Mobil Corporation
Defendant:	Tredegar Corporation
Case Number:	1:2011cv02829
Filed:	April 26, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 13, 2012	Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 22 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint, filed by Tredegar Corporation. Exxon Mobil Corporation (Exxon) sues Tredegar Corporation (Tredegar) for breach of an Asset Purchase Agreement (APA). The amended complaint all eges that Tredegar failed to indemnify Exxon for a settlement in a Pennsylvania personal injury action, and that Tredegar failed to cooperate with Exxons defense of the action in violation of the APA. Tredegar moves to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 2(b) (6). For the reasons stated herein, Tredegar's motion is granted in part and denied in part. Tredegar's motion to dismiss is granted as to Count I of the amended complaint. The motion is denied as to Count II, except with respect to the access to records claim under Section 12.7 of the APA. (Signed by Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum on 9/12/2012) (ja)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 13, 2012

Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 22 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint, filed by Tredegar Corporation. Exxon Mobil Corporation (Exxon) sues Tredegar Corporation (Tredegar) for breach of an Asset Purchase Agreement (APA). The amended complaint all eges that Tredegar failed to indemnify Exxon for a settlement in a Pennsylvania personal injury action, and that Tredegar failed to cooperate with Exxons defense of the action in violation of the APA. Tredegar moves to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 2(b) (6). For the reasons stated herein, Tredegar's motion is granted in part and denied in part. Tredegar's motion to dismiss is granted as to Count I of the amended complaint. The motion is denied as to Count II, except with respect to the access to records claim under Section 12.7 of the APA. (Signed by Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum on 9/12/2012) (ja)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Tredegar Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Tredegar Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Exxon Mobil Corporation
Represented By:	Daniel Bartholomew Carroll
Represented By:	Marsha Jessica Indych
Represented By:	Gregory P Miller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?