Gonzales et al v. Tiano's Construction Corp. et al
Andres Gonzales |
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Lloyd Ambinder, Tiano's Construction Corp., Mitrani Plasterers Co. Inc., Tiano's Construction Mitrani Cesare General Partnership, GBE Alasia Contracting Corp., Safeco Insurance Company of North America and Pythagoras General Contracting Corp. |
1:2011cv03021 |
April 28, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Bronx |
Deborah A. Batts |
Henry B. Pitman |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 52 Report and Recommendations Having reviewed the Report, and finding no clear error on the face of the record, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman, dated February 6,2013, be and the same hereby is APPROVED, ADOPTED, and RATIFIED by the Court in its entirety. The Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Tiano's Construction Cor p. and Mitrani Plasterers Co. Inc. is hereby GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED as against these Defendants. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3),that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith,and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438,444-45 (1962).(Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 3/18/2013) (ago) |
Filing 54 ADOPTION OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman, dated May 18, 2012, as amended by Judge Pitman's February 6, 2013 Order, be and the same hereby is APPROVED, ADOPTED, and RATIFIED by the Court in its entirety. This action is hereby DISMISSED as to Defendants Tiano's Construction Mitrani Cesare General Partnership, GBE Alasia Contracting Corp., Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Com pany. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. (Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 2/11/2013) (pl) Modified on 2/11/2013 (pl). |
Filing 49 ADOPTION OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 14 Motion to Dismiss filed by Safeco Insurance Company of North America, Pythagoras General Contracting Corp., 38 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Objections are insufficient to trigger de nov o review of the Report. The Court therefore reviews the Report for clear error. The Court having found none, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman, dated July 6, 2012, be a nd the same hereby is APPROVED, ADOPTED, and RATIFIED by the Court in its entirety. This action is hereby DISMISSED as to Defendants Pythagoras and Safeco. This Order resolves the Motion at Docket Number 14. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962)., Pythagoras General Contracting Corp. and Safeco Insurance Company of North America terminated. (Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 9/28/2012) (lmb) Modified on 9/28/2012 (lmb). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.