Polanco v. Tiano's Construction Corp. et al
Doroteo Polanco |
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, GBE Alasia Contracting Corp., Pythagoras General Contracting Corp., Safeco Insurance Company of North America, Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Tiano's Construction Corp., Mitrani Plasterers Co. Inc., Lloyd Ambinder and Tiano's Construction Mitrani Cesare General Partnership |
1:2011cv03024 |
April 28, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Bronx |
Deborah A. Batts |
Henry B. Pitman |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ADOPTION OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 53 Report and Recommendations: This matter is before the Court upon the March 26, 2014 Amended Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman (the "Report"). Judg e Pitman's Report recommends that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Report at 3.)... Having reviewed the Report, and finding no clear error on the face of the record, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1)(B), it is hereby ORDERED A ND ADJUDGED that the Amended Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman, dated March 26, 2014, be and the same hereby is APPROVED, ADOPTED, and RATIFIED by the Court in its entirety. This action is hereby DISMISSE D for failure to prosecute. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to close the docket in this matter. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 5/8/2014) (ja) Modified on 5/8/2014 (ja). |
Filing 50 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 49 Report and Recommendations: Having reviewed the Report, and finding no clear error onthe face of the record, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), it ishereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation ofUnited States Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman, dated February 6,2013, be and the same hereby is APPROVED, ADOPTED, and RATIFIED by the Court in its entirety. The Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Tiano's Construction Corp. and Mitrani Plasterers Co. Inc. is hereby GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED as against these Defendants. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3),that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith,and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438,444-45 {1962). (Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 3/18/2013) (ago) |
Filing 42 ADOPTION OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: for 33 Report and Recommendations. Having reviewed the Report, and finding no clear error on the face of the record, see 28 U.S.C. § 636{b) (1)(B), it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and R ecommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman, dated May 21, 2012, be and the same hereby is APPROVED, ADOPTED, and RATIFIED by the Court in its entirety. This action is hereby DISMISSED as to Defendant GBE Alasia Contracting Corp. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Deborah A. Batts on 9/6/2012) (ja) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.