Prolec GE International, S. De R.L.., De C.V. v. HLI Rail & Rigging, LLC et al
| Prolec GE International, S. De R.L.., De C.V. |
| HLI Rail & Rigging, LLC, Fresh Meadow Mechanical Corp., Kansas City Southern Railway Company and City Underwriting Agency, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv03238 |
| May 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of U.S. |
| Richard J. Holwell |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1337 sc Sherman-Clayton Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
342
OPINION & ORDER: Pursuant to this Court's February 9, 2015 Opinion & Order (ECF No. 341), the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate Kansas City Southern Railway Company ("KCSR") as a Cross Claimant and HLI Rail & Rigging, LLC ("HLI") as a Cross Defendant in this action. KCSR and HLI will continue as parties in this action in all other respects. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 2/10/2015) (kgo)
|
|
Filing
341
OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated above, the Court has reconsidered its decision and the part of HLI and FMMC's November 9, 2012 cross-motion (ECF No. 116) for summary judgment on KCSR's cross-claim for contractual indemnification i s GRANTED. The March 13, 2014 Opinion & Order, Chartis Seguros Mexico, SA. de C.V. v. HLI Rail & Rigging, 3 F. Supp. 3d 171 (S.D.N.Y. 2014), is superseded to the extent it is inconsistent with any of the foregoing. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 2/9/2015) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
280
ORDER AND OPINION: re: 168 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Fireman's Fund Insurance Company. For the reasons set forth above, FFIC's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 168) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, consistent with this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 3/13/2014) (ama)
|
|
Filing
226
ORDER AND OPINION: For the reasons stated herein, FFIC's motion to compel arbitration and sever the cross-claim(Dkt. No. 88) is granted. To the extent FFIC moves to stay HLI/Fresh's third-party claims,that motion is denied without prejudice. CUA's cross-motion to stay the arbitration (Dkt. No.104) is denied. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 8/20/2013) (js)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
