Rudder v. John Doe et al
| Gavin Rudder |
| John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 1:2011cv03453 |
| May 10, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| James L. Cott |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER for 62 Report and Recommendations, 56 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Prosecution, filed by Amanda Encke, Scott Annicelli, Christian Jimenez, Dennis Harrison, Keith Silardi. The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Cott's April 7, 20 14, Report and Recommendation (the "Report"), which recommends that Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's amended complaint with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute be granted. Neithe r party filed objections to the Report. The Court has carefully reviewed Magistrate Judge Cott's thorough Report and finds no clear error. The Court therefore adopts the Report in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. Defendant's mot ion for dismiss with prejudice is granted. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. This Order resolves docket entry number 56. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 6/23/2014) Copies Sent by Chambers. (ajs) Modified on 6/23/2014 (ajs).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
