Butt v. Megabus Northeast LLC

Butt v. Megabus Northeast LLC

Plaintiff:	Fabian Butt
Defendant:	Megabus Northeast LLC
Case Number:	1:2011cv03993
Filed:	June 13, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Bronx
Presiding Judge:	George B. Daniels
Nature of Suit:	Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 201
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 25, 2012	Filing 54 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS FOR CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASSES, FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, AND APPROVAL OF FLSA SETTLEMENT; APPROVAL OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES; AND APPROVAL OF REPRESENTATIV E SERVICE AWARD (IN THE FORM OF INCENTIVE PAYMENT): granting 46 Motion to Approve ; granting 49 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 51 Motion to Approve. The "Effective Date" of the Settlement shall be 31 days after the date of this Or der if no party appeals this Order. If a party appeals this Order, the "Effective Date" of the settlements shall be the day after all appeals are finally resolved (Settlement Agreement § 1.17). Settlement Shares and the Service Award (in the form of an Incentive Payment) will be mailed by Defendant to Qualified Class Members within twenty (20) days following the Effective Date. (Settlement Agreement § 2.8). Payment of Class Counsel's Attorneys' Fees (inclusive of Class Counsel's costs) will also be mailed by Defendant to Class Counsel within twenty (20) days following the Effective Date. (Settlement Agreement § 2.8). Defendant shall mail all applicable IRS Forms (and any other similar forms as requ ired by any other government agency) to Qualified Class Members and Class Counsel in a timely manner in accordance with applicable law. This action shall be dismissed on the merits with prejudice and all Qualified Class Members, as defined in the Se ttlement Agreement, shall be and are permanently barred from prosecuting against Defendant, any individual or class claims encompassed in Sections 3.1 or 3.2 of the Settlement Agreement, including without limitation, any claims arising out of the act s, facts, transactions, occurrences, representations, or omissions set forth in the Lawsuit; and through the Effective Date of the Settlement. The Court retains jurisdiction over this action for the purpose of enforcing the Settlement Agreement. The parties shall abide by all terms of the Settlement Agreement and this Order. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/25/2012) (pl)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 25, 2012

Filing 54 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS FOR CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASSES, FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, AND APPROVAL OF FLSA SETTLEMENT; APPROVAL OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES; AND APPROVAL OF REPRESENTATIV E SERVICE AWARD (IN THE FORM OF INCENTIVE PAYMENT): granting 46 Motion to Approve ; granting 49 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 51 Motion to Approve. The "Effective Date" of the Settlement shall be 31 days after the date of this Or der if no party appeals this Order. If a party appeals this Order, the "Effective Date" of the settlements shall be the day after all appeals are finally resolved (Settlement Agreement § 1.17). Settlement Shares and the Service Award (in the form of an Incentive Payment) will be mailed by Defendant to Qualified Class Members within twenty (20) days following the Effective Date. (Settlement Agreement § 2.8). Payment of Class Counsel's Attorneys' Fees (inclusive of Class Counsel's costs) will also be mailed by Defendant to Class Counsel within twenty (20) days following the Effective Date. (Settlement Agreement § 2.8). Defendant shall mail all applicable IRS Forms (and any other similar forms as requ ired by any other government agency) to Qualified Class Members and Class Counsel in a timely manner in accordance with applicable law. This action shall be dismissed on the merits with prejudice and all Qualified Class Members, as defined in the Se ttlement Agreement, shall be and are permanently barred from prosecuting against Defendant, any individual or class claims encompassed in Sections 3.1 or 3.2 of the Settlement Agreement, including without limitation, any claims arising out of the act s, facts, transactions, occurrences, representations, or omissions set forth in the Lawsuit; and through the Effective Date of the Settlement. The Court retains jurisdiction over this action for the purpose of enforcing the Settlement Agreement. The parties shall abide by all terms of the Settlement Agreement and this Order. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/25/2012) (pl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Butt v. Megabus Northeast LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Megabus Northeast LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fabian Butt
Represented By:	Christopher Quincy Davis
Represented By:	Robert Walter Ottinger, Jr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?