Fifty-Ninth Street Investors LLC et al v. Ernst & Young LLP et al
Fifty-Ninth Street Investors LLC and Arthur N. Abbey |
Ernst & Young LLP, Richard S. Fuld, Jr. and Christopher M. O'Meara |
1:2011cv04278 |
June 23, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Richard J. Holwell |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 95 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: (65 in 1:11-cv-04278-LAK) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ernst & Young LLP, (1466 in 1:09-md-02017-LAK-GWG) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ernst & Young LLP. Accordingly, EY's motion for summary judgment of dismissal [09-md-2017, DI1466; 11-cv-4278, DI 65] is granted on loss causation grounds. The Clerk shall close Case No. 11-cv-4278. (As further set forth in this Memorandum Opinion.) (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 9/10/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:09-md-02017-LAK-GWG, 1:11-cv-04278-LAK(mro) |
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: (590 in 1:09-md-02017-LAK-GWG) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss /Notice of Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaints filed by Christopher M. O'Meara. For the foregoing reasons, the defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaints (MDL Dkt. 591) is granted. Any application for leave to amend shall be filed within 14 days. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 10/22/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:09-md-02017-LAK-GWG, 1:11-cv-04278-LAK, 1:11-cv-05112-LAK(lmb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.