Fifty-Ninth Street Investors LLC et al v. Ernst & Young LLP et al
Plaintiff: Fifty-Ninth Street Investors LLC and Arthur N. Abbey
Defendant: Ernst & Young LLP, Richard S. Fuld, Jr. and Christopher M. O'Meara
Case Number: 1:2011cv04278
Filed: June 23, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Richard J. Holwell
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause of Action: 15:78
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 95 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: (65 in 1:11-cv-04278-LAK) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ernst & Young LLP, (1466 in 1:09-md-02017-LAK-GWG) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ernst & Young LLP. Accordingly, EY's motion for summary judgment of dismissal [09-md-2017, DI1466; 11-cv-4278, DI 65] is granted on loss causation grounds. The Clerk shall close Case No. 11-cv-4278. (As further set forth in this Memorandum Opinion.) (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 9/10/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:09-md-02017-LAK-GWG, 1:11-cv-04278-LAK(mro)
October 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: (590 in 1:09-md-02017-LAK-GWG) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss /Notice of Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaints filed by Christopher M. O'Meara. For the foregoing reasons, the defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaints (MDL Dkt. 591) is granted. Any application for leave to amend shall be filed within 14 days. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 10/22/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:09-md-02017-LAK-GWG, 1:11-cv-04278-LAK, 1:11-cv-05112-LAK(lmb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fifty-Ninth Street Investors LLC et al v. Ernst & Young LLP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fifty-Ninth Street Investors LLC
Represented By: James Stephenson Burrell, II
Represented By: Nancy Kaboolian
Represented By: Stephen Thran Rodd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arthur N. Abbey
Represented By: James Stephenson Burrell, II
Represented By: Nancy Kaboolian
Represented By: Stephen Thran Rodd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ernst & Young LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard S. Fuld, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher M. O'Meara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?