Biro v. Conde Nast et al
Plaintiff: Peter Paul Biro
Defendant: Conde Nast, David Grann and Dan Rattiner
Case Number: 1:2011cv04442
Filed: June 29, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of U.S.
Presiding Judge: Richard M. Berman
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 212 OPINION AND ORDER re: 205 MOTION for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b) or for Certification, filed by Peter Paul Biro, 178 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Global Fine Art Registry LLC, Theresa Franks, 189 CROSS MOTION for Parti al Summary Judgment. filed by Peter Paul Biro, 175 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed by Louise Blouin Media Inc. For the foregoing reasons, the motion of Defendant Louise Blouin Media for judgment on the pleadings [Dkt. No. 175] is GRANTED; the motion of Defendants Global Fine Art Registry LLC and Theresa Franks for judgment on the pleadings [Dkt. No. 178] is GRANTED; the cross-motion of Plaintiff Peter Paul Biro for partial summary judgment [Dkt. No. 189] is DENIED; and Pl aintiff's motion for entry of final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) or certification of interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) [Dkt. No. 205] is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions at Doc ket Nos. 175, 178, 189, and 205. Because all claims against all Defendants in this case have been dismissed, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/29/2014) (ja)
August 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 168 OPINION AND ORDER re: 108 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended and Supplemental Complaint filed by Gawker Media LLC, 116 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended And Supplemental Complaint filed by Paddy Johnson, 142 MOTION to Dismiss. filed by Yale University Press, 100 MOTION to Dismiss. filed by Business Insider, Inc, 132 MOTION to Dismiss Third Amended and Supplemental Complaint filed by Gawker Media LLC, 156 MOTION for Judgment on the Ple adings filed by David Grann, Advance Magazine Publishers Inc., 105 MOTION For An Order Finding Plaintiff To Be A Public Figure. filed by David Grann, Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. For the foregoing reasons, the New Yorker Defendants motion for an order finding Biro to be a public figure is GRANTED, and their motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED. The motions to dismiss by Yale University Press, Paddy Johnson, Gawker Media, and Business Insider are also GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motions at 100, 105, 108, 116, 132, 142, and 156. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 8/1/2013) (tro)
August 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 56 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. filed by Global Fine Art Registry LLC, Theresa Franks, 65 CROSS MOTION Payment of costs for service of process re: 56 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. f iled by Peter Paul Biro. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants motion to dismiss the Second Amended and Supplemental Complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 56) is DENIED without prejudice to its renewal following completion of limited discovery. Plaintiff's motion for costs of service (Dkt. No. 65) is DENIED. The parties shall confer on the appropriate scope and schedule for jurisdictional discovery and submit a joint letter to the Court with a proposed schedule no later than August 24, 2012. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 8/10/2012) (djc)
August 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 20 MOTION to Dismiss filed by David Grann, Conde Nast. For the foregoing reasons, the motion of Defendants David Grann and Conde Nast/Advance to dismiss the Second Amended and Supplemental Complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this motion (Dkt. No. 20). (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 8/9/2012) (lmb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Biro v. Conde Nast et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter Paul Biro
Represented By: Richard Allen Altman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Conde Nast
Represented By: Lynn B. Oberlander
Represented By: Amanda Marie Leith
Represented By: David A.. Schulz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Grann
Represented By: Amanda Marie Leith
Represented By: David A.. Schulz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dan Rattiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?