Jalee Consulting Group, Inc. v. Xenoone, Inc. et al
| Jalee Consulting Group, Inc. |
| Xenoone, Inc. and Xenoone Co., Ltd. |
| 1:2011cv04720 |
| July 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of U.S. |
| Richard J. Sullivan |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. XenoOne Korea's motion dismiss Plaintiffs claim for injunctive relief to compel arbitration in New York City is HEREBY GRANTED. XenoOne USA's moti on to dismiss Plaintiffs claims for breach of contract or, in the alternative, quasi-contractual relief, IS HEREBY DENIED. By October 31, 2012, the parties shall jointly submit to the Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order. A temp late for the order is available at http://wwwl.nysd.uscourts.gov/judge_info.p hp?id=99. In light of this decision, it may be appropriate for the parties to conduct expedited discovery regarding the "intertwined-ness" of the alleged contracts between Plaintiff and XenoOne USA and the Agreement between Plaintiff and XenoOne Korea. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Doc. No. 19. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 9/29/2012) (ago)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
