Continental Terminals, Inc. v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Continental Terminals, Inc. v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor

Continental Terminals, Inc. v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor

Plaintiff:	Continental Terminals, Inc.
Defendant:	Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
Case Number:	1:2011cv04869
Filed:	July 14, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Laura Taylor Swain
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 30, 2013	Filing 47 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 29 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 35 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the foregoing reasons, there are no genuine disputes of material fact and the Commission is therefore entitled to summary judgment as a matter o f law. The Court hereby grants the Commission's summary judgment motion, declaring that Continental's warehousing operations located at 112 Port Jersey Boulevard, Jersey City, New Jersey, are stevedoring operations within the meaning of the Act and that Continental must therefore be licensed as such and its employees accordingly registered. Continental's motion for summary judgment is denied in its entirety. This Memorandum Order resolves docket entries 29 and 35. The Clerk of the Court is requested to enter judgment in the Defendant Commission's favor and close this case. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 9/30/2013) (ja)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 30, 2013

Filing 47 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 29 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 35 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the foregoing reasons, there are no genuine disputes of material fact and the Commission is therefore entitled to summary judgment as a matter o f law. The Court hereby grants the Commission's summary judgment motion, declaring that Continental's warehousing operations located at 112 Port Jersey Boulevard, Jersey City, New Jersey, are stevedoring operations within the meaning of the Act and that Continental must therefore be licensed as such and its employees accordingly registered. Continental's motion for summary judgment is denied in its entirety. This Memorandum Order resolves docket entries 29 and 35. The Clerk of the Court is requested to enter judgment in the Defendant Commission's favor and close this case. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 9/30/2013) (ja)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Continental Terminals, Inc. v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Continental Terminals, Inc.
Represented By:	Ryan Michael Finn
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?