Federal Housing Finance Agency as Conservator for the Federal National Mortgage Association et al v. UBS Americas Inc. et al
| Federal Housing Finance Agency as Conservator for the Federal National Mortgage Association and The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation |
| UBS Americas Inc., UBS Real Estate Securities Inc., UBS Securities, LLC, Mortgage Asset Securitization Transactions, Inc., David Martin, Per Dyrvik, Hugh Corcoran and Peter Slagowitz |
| 1:2011cv05201 |
| July 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Victor Marrero |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
618
OPINION & ORDER. Before the Court are defendants' memoranda of law regarding applicable legal standards and the appropriate standards for discovery in light of the applicable legal standards. The defendants have suggested over the course of thi s litigation that the Court's discovery rulings have been premised on a faulty definition of the "knowledge" defense that is available to them under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"). In this briefi ng they address the legal standard for their affirmative defense that the plaintiff actually knew of the alleged misrepresentations in the Prospectus Supplements that governed its securities purchases. The defendants have taken this opportunity to a ddress as well the legal standards for several of the elements and other defenses of the Securities Act claims in this litigation and to argue that the application of incorrect legal standards has deprived them of certain discovery from a portion of the plaintiff's business described below: the Single Family business. For the reasons stated below, the Court concludes that its previous discovery rulings have been made under the correct legal standards and need not be revisited. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 6/28/2013) (gr)
|
|
Filing
488
OPINION AND ORDER denying the UBS Defendants' application to require the Federal Housing Finanace Agency to pay either $250,000 or at least $85,000 of the cost incurred in identifying certain files produced by third parties. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 3/26/2013) (gr)
|
|
Filing
249
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying discovery of privileged witness statements. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 11/9/12) (gr)
|
|
Filing
113
OPINION AND ORDER: The portion of the January 20 Motion seeking to dismiss plaintiff's claims with regard to the seven issuances identified in note 1, supra, is denied. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 6/26/2012) (ft)
|
|
Filing
109
OPINION AND ORDER re: 83 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability filed by Peter Slagowitz, David Martin, UBS Securities, LLC, Mortgage Asset Securitization Transactions, Inc., Hugh Corcoran, UBS Real Estate Securities Inc., Per Dyrvik, UBS Americas Inc. Defendants' May 23 motion for certification of an interlocutory appeal of the May 4 Opinion is granted. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 6/19/2012) (jar)
|
|
Filing
66
OPINION & ORDER re: 51 MOTION to Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint filed by Peter Slagowitz, David Martin, UBS Securities, LLC, Mortgage Asset Securitization Transactions, Inc., Hugh Corcoran, UBS Real Estate Securities Inc., Per Dyrvik, UBS Americas Inc. Defendants' January 20 motion to dismiss is denied as to FHFA's securities law claims and granted as to the negligent misrepresentation claims. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 5/4/2012) (tro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
