Ironshore Insurance Ltd. v. Western Asset Management Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Ironshore Insurance Ltd. v. Western Asset Management Company

Ironshore Insurance Ltd. v. Western Asset Management Company

Plaintiff:	Ironshore Insurance Ltd.
Defendant:	Western Asset Management Company
Case Number:	1:2011cv05954
Filed:	August 24, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of U.S.
Presiding Judge:	Laura Taylor Swain
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 15, 2013	Filing 81 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons discussed, the plaintiff's motion is denied except to the extent that it may amend exhibits 2 and 3 to Dr. Mordechai's rebuttal report. Of course, Ironshore can depose Western's experts or cross-examine them at trial with respect to the basis for their opinions. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 5/15/2013) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rdz)
July 31, 2012	Filing 43 ORDER denying 32 Motion. Defendant Western Asset Management ("Western") has moved for certification for an interlocutory appeal of the Court's May 30, 2012, Memorandum Order, which held that an investment manager is not a "profe ssional" for the purposes of Rule 214(6) of New York's Civil Practice Law and Rules (the "CPLR"). For the following reasons, the motion is denied. As Western has not demonstrated a substantial ground for difference of opinion, the motion for certification of the May 30 Memorandum Order for an interlocutory appeal is hereby denied. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/31/2012) (ja)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 15, 2013

Filing 81 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons discussed, the plaintiff's motion is denied except to the extent that it may amend exhibits 2 and 3 to Dr. Mordechai's rebuttal report. Of course, Ironshore can depose Western's experts or cross-examine them at trial with respect to the basis for their opinions. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 5/15/2013) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rdz)

July 31, 2012

Filing 43 ORDER denying 32 Motion. Defendant Western Asset Management ("Western") has moved for certification for an interlocutory appeal of the Court's May 30, 2012, Memorandum Order, which held that an investment manager is not a "profe ssional" for the purposes of Rule 214(6) of New York's Civil Practice Law and Rules (the "CPLR"). For the following reasons, the motion is denied. As Western has not demonstrated a substantial ground for difference of opinion, the motion for certification of the May 30 Memorandum Order for an interlocutory appeal is hereby denied. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/31/2012) (ja)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ironshore Insurance Ltd. v. Western Asset Management Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ironshore Insurance Ltd.
Represented By:	David George Januszewski
Represented By:	Thorn Rosenthal
Represented By:	Ben Adam Schatz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Western Asset Management Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?