Tenor Opportunity Master Fund Ltd. et al v. Oxygen Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tenor Opportunity Master Fund Ltd., Aria Opportunity Fund, Ltd. and Parsoon Opportunity Fund, Ltd
Defendant: Oxygen Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2011cv06067
Filed: August 30, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of U.S.
Presiding Judge: Richard J. Holwell
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 74 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Tenor's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and defendant Oxygen/s motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Accordingly, summary judgment is granted for Tenor on the question of Oxygen's liability for breach of contract. Because Tenor raised a triable issue of fact as to the amount of damages it sustained--i.e., proved that it did sustain some damages sufficient to meet the fourth element of a breach of contract action--the question of damages must be prese nted to a jury for final determination. The Court ORDERS that plaintiff must produce Mr. Levin, their proposed expert on damages, for a one-day deposition at any time prior to trial. Failure to do so will result in preclusion of Mr. Levin appearing at trial. The July 25, 2012 final pretrial conference and the July 30, 2012 trial dates are adjourned. A trial on damages will be held on September 10, 2012. The parties are to appear at a final pretrial conference on August 30, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. Al l joint pretrial materials are due by August 28, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. They are to be delivered to the Court no later than that date and time as well. The Clerk of the Court shall terminate the motions at Docket Nos. 28 and 31. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 7/11/2012) (ft)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tenor Opportunity Master Fund Ltd. et al v. Oxygen Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tenor Opportunity Master Fund Ltd.
Represented By: Carolyn Elizabeth Kruk
Represented By: David Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aria Opportunity Fund, Ltd.
Represented By: David Dunn
Represented By: Carolyn Elizabeth Kruk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Parsoon Opportunity Fund, Ltd
Represented By: David Dunn
Represented By: Carolyn Elizabeth Kruk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oxygen Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Represented By: Martin Paul Russo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?