Malloy v. EMI Christian Music Group, Inc. et al
Gospel artist Travis Malloy sues defendants EMI Christian Music, Sony Music Entertainment, and Darius Paulk for copyright infringement, alleging that Malloy was not given co-writing credits for an EMI artist's recording, which would have entitled him to royalty payments for his work.
| Travis Malloy |
| EMI Christian Music Group, Inc., Sony Music Entertainment, Inc. and Darius Paulk |
| 1:2011cv06075 |
| August 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Richard J. Sullivan |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed notice to Register of Copyrights to report the filing of this action. (mro) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Travis Malloy.(mro) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EMI Christian Music Group, Inc., Darius Paulk, Sony Music Entertainment, Inc. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 1015234)Document filed by Travis Malloy.(mro) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. (mro) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to EMI Christian Music Group, Inc., Darius Paulk, Sony Music Entertainment, Inc. (mro) |
| Case Designated ECF. (mro) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
