Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Barclays Bank Plc, et al
Federal Housing Finance Agency |
Barclays Bank Plc, Barclays Capital Inc., Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC, Michael Wade, John Carroll and Paul Menefee |
1:2011cv06190 |
September 2, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Deborah A. Batts |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 496 OPINION & ORDER re: 454 JOINT MOTION to Compel Federal Housing Finance Agency to produce documents withheld on the basis of the bank examination and deliberative process privileges. filed by John Carroll, Paul Menefee, Barclays Capital Inc. , Michael Wade, Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC, Barclays Bank Plc. The defendants August 30, 2013 motion to compel production of documents withheld by FHFA on the basis of the bank examination and deliberative process privileges is denied. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 10/16/2013) (djc) |
Filing 145 OPINION & ORDER re: 68 MOTION to Dismiss filed by John Carroll, Paul Menefee, Barclays Capital Inc., Michael Wade, Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC, Barclays Bank Plc. The defendants' August 17 motion to dismiss is granted with respect to the plaintiff's Virginia Securities Act claims against SABR and the individual defendants and denied in all other respects. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 11/19/2012) (mro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.