Automobile Club of New York, Inc. et al v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
| Automobile Club of New York, Inc. and AAA North Jersey, Inc. |
| The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey |
| 1:2011cv06746 |
| September 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Nassau |
| Richard J. Holwell |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
172
OPINION re: 132 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey: For the foregoing reasons, defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, andplaintiff's claims are dismissed in their entirety. (Signed by Judge Richard K. Eaton on 11/18/2016) (tn)
|
|
Filing
143
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Based on the foregoing, the court finds no merit in AAA's objections and, therefore, affirms the June 4 Opinion. (Signed by Judge Richard K. Eaton on 5/27/2015) (kgo)
|
|
Filing
129
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 116 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction , dated October 24, 2014 filed by Automobile Club of New York, Inc., AAA North Jersey, Inc.: AAA has not shown that, should the December 7, 2014 toll increa se go forward, irreparable injury will result. Moreover, AAA has not met the heavy burden of showing it is "likely" to prevail on the merits. See Sussman, 488 F.3d at 140 (citing Mazurek, 520 U.S. at 972); see also Subaru Distribs. Corp. v. Subaru of Am., Inc., 47 F. Supp. 2d 451, 460 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) ("The movant carries the heavy burden of showing... [a] likelihood of success on the merits."). While it may be that a second motion for a preliminary injunction may be gr anted when there are new facts on the record, here, there are few new facts and those that have been presented to the court do not serve as the basis for a preliminary injunction. Based on the foregoing this second motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Richard K. Eaton, Sitting By Designation, on 12/2/2014) (tn) Modified on 12/2/2014 (tn).
|
|
Filing
102
OPINION AND ORDER 104403 re: 91 MOTION to Compel The port Authority of New York and New Jersey to produce documents withheld by defendant pursuant to the deliberative process privilege filed by Automobile Club of New York, Inc., AAA North Jersey, Inc.: Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, AAA's motion to compel (Docket Item 91) is denied in its entirety. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 6/4/2014) Copies Transmitted By Chambers. (tn) Modified on 6/4/2014 (nt).
|
|
Filing
81
OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, the Port Authority shall supplement its privilege log as directed in this Opinion and Order. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 5/8/2013) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ft)
|
|
Filing
69
OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs' motion is (1) denied without prejudice to renewal to the extent that it seeks to expand the scope of discovery, and (2) denied to the extent that it seeks guidance as to future depositions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 10/09/2012) (ama)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the forgoing reasons, AAA's application for a preliminary injunction is DENIED. The Port Authority's motion (ECF Docket No. 11) is converted to a motion for summary judgment, The court reserves ruling on the motion, and will refer the case to the Magistrate Judge to supervise discovery in connection with the motion. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 2/6/2012) (mro)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 9 MOTION for Leave to File amicus curiae brief. The court has reviewed Grimms and Malliotakis proposed brief, and finds it to provide helpful information independent of its partiality. For the above reasons, and considering that the Grimm motion was unopposed, the motion 9 for leave to file an amicus curiae brief is hereby GRANTED. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 11/22/2011) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
