U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
| U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Citigroup Global Markets Inc. |
| The Union Central Life Inusrance Company, Ameritas Life Insurance Corp., Acacia Life Insurance Company and The Union Central Life Insurance Company |
| 1:2011cv07387 |
| October 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Jed S. Rakoff |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 33
OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, the Court refuses to approve the proposed Consent Judgment. Instead, the Court hereby consolidates this case with the Stoker action, adopts the Case Management Order in that action as equally applicable to the instant case, and directs the parties to be ready to try this case on July 16, 2012. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 11/28/2011) (jfe)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Ready for Trial by 7/16/2012. (jfe) |
|
Filing 28
ORDER denying 14 Motion to Intervene. Pending before the Court is Better Markets, Inc.'s Motion to Intervene in the above captioned case. That motion is denied substantially for the reasons stated in the S.E.C.'s memorandum in opposition. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close item number 14 on the docket of this case. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 11/8/2011) (lmb)
|
| Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 14 MOTION to Intervene Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24.. Document filed by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (Martens, Matthew) |
| Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support of the Proposed Final Judgment and Consent. Document filed by Citigroup Global Markets Inc.. (Karp, Brad) |
| Filing 23 MOTION for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief. Document filed by The Union Central Life Inusrance Company, Ameritas Life Insurance Corp., Acacia Life Insurance Company, The Union Central Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Brief)(Rudman, Samuel) |
| Filing 22 DECLARATION of Matthew T. Martens re: 21 Memorandum of Law. Document filed by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-D)(Martens, Matthew) |
| Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OF LAW re: 9 Order, Set Hearings,,,, In Response To Questions Posed By The Court Regarding Proposed Settlement. Document filed by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (Martens, Matthew) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: The Court is required to ascertain whether the proposed judgment is fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the public interest. The Court will convene a hearing on November 9, 2011 at 3:00 pm to assist in this determination. The parties should be prepared to answer the questions set forth within in detail at the hearing. In addition, the parties are permitted but not required, to file with the Court written answers to these questions in advance of the hearing, provided such submissions are filed no later than noon on November 7, 2011. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 10/27/2011) (ab)
|
| Filing 8 Proposed Final Judgment As To Defendant Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (ad) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM by Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission in Support of Proposed Settlement. Document filed by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (lmb) (jar). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Citigroup Global Markets Inc.Document filed by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.(lmb) (ama). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
