Makinen et al v. City of New York et al
Plaintiff: Kathleen Makinen, Jamie Nardini and Angel Torres
Defendant: City of New York, Raymond W. Kelly, New York City Police Department and Daniel J. Sweeney
Case Number: 1:2011cv07535
Filed: October 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: William H. Pauley
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 189 OPINION AND ORDER re: 181 MOTION for Attorney Fees, Costs and Interest filed by Kathleen Makinen, Jamie Nardini, Angel Torres. For the reasons set forth above, the Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees, costs, and post-judgment interest. The Court awards: (1) attorneys' fees in the amount of $184,510.50; and (2) costs in the amount of $38,101.93. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 2/28/2019) (ne)
April 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 160 OPINION AND ORDER re: 139 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs. filed by Kathleen Makinen, Jamie Nardini, Angel Torres. For the reasons set forth above, the Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff's motion for attorney s' fees, costs, pre-judgment interest, and post-judgment interest. The Court awards: (1) attorneys' fees in the amount of $408,347; (2) costs in the amount of $88,586.68; (3) prejudgment interest on Makinen's economic damages in the amount of $4,381.92; and (4) post-judgment interest in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 4/12/2016) (kgo)
March 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 155 OPINION AND ORDER #106246 re: 131 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law . MOTION for New Trial . filed by Raymond W. Kelly, Daniel J. Sweeney, City of New York. Defendants' Rule 50 Motion is GRANTED as to the punitiv e damages awarded against Commissioner Kelly and DENIED as to all other claims. Defendants' Rule 59 motion is DENIED as to all claims. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 2/29/2016) (kgo) Modified on 3/1/2016 (kgo). Modified on 3/1/2016 (ca).
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 64 OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 32) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs' claims against the NYPD are dismissed in their entirety, as are Counts VI through XI of the Amended Complaint. Counts I through III are dismissed with respect to Plaintiff Nardini only. Plaintiffs' cross-motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 33) is DENIED. re: 33 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Kathleen Makinen, Jamie Nardini, Angel Torres, 32 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by New York City Police Department, Raymond W. Kelly, Daniel J. Sweeney, City of New York. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 9/30/2014) (rjm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Makinen et al v. City of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen Makinen
Represented By: Lisa Ferro Joslin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamie Nardini
Represented By: Lisa Ferro Joslin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angel Torres
Represented By: Lisa Ferro Joslin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of New York
Represented By: Eric Jay Eichenholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raymond W. Kelly
Represented By: Eric Jay Eichenholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Police Department
Represented By: Eric Jay Eichenholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel J. Sweeney
Represented By: Eric Jay Eichenholtz
Represented By: Eric Jay Eichenholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?