Mendez v. Skymax Dominica, SA
Plaintiff: Carlos Ziegenhirt Mendez
Defendant: Skymax Dominica, SA
Case Number: 1:2011cv07548
Filed: October 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Denise L. Cote
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND order re: 21 FIRST MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal filed by Carlos Ziegenhirt Mendez: The Plaintiff's December 9 motion to stay the arbitration pending appeal is denied. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 12/13/2011) (ab)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mendez v. Skymax Dominica, SA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Ziegenhirt Mendez
Represented By: Debra Bodian Bernstein
Represented By: Andrew Neal Krinsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Skymax Dominica, SA
Represented By: Peretz Bronstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?