United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gupta et al Featured Case
Plaintiff: United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Rajat K. Gupta and Raj Rajaratnam
Case Number: 1:2011cv07566
Filed: October 26, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Jed S. Rakoff
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2012 Filing 49 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a CONFERENCE proceeding held on 7/10/12 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days...(McGuirk, Kelly)
August 6, 2012 Filing 48 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: CONFERNCE held on 7/10/2012 before Judge Jed S. Rakoff. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Linda Fisher, (212) 805-0300. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/30/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/10/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/8/2012.(McGuirk, Kelly)
July 10, 2012 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff: Status Conference held on 7/10/2012. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DUE 12-5-2012, RESPONSE 12-19-2012, REPLIES 12-31-2012. Argument set for 1-7-2013 at 4:00pm. Jury trial date set 2-11-2013. (Kotowski, Linda) Modified on 7/12/2012 (jar).
July 3, 2012 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff: Telephone Conference held on 7/3/2012. (js)
May 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM ORDER: Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, the motion to compel is denied. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 4/30/2012) (mro)
April 11, 2012 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff: Telephone Conference held on 4/11/2012. (ft)
March 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Court hereby grants defendants' motion to compel Blankfein to answer any and all questions concerning his pre-deposition meetings with attorneys from the SEC and USAO. Because the February 24, 2012 deposition used all seven hours of the allotted deposition time, defendants will have permission to promptly depose Blankfein for an additional two hours, limited to questions about Blankfein's meetings with the SEC and USAO in preparation for his first deposition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(1). (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 3/26/2012) (ab)
March 2, 2012 Filing 45 Letter addressed to Judge Jed S. Rakoff from Gary P. Naftalis dated 3/1/2012 re: Counsel for the Defendant writes to request that the Court issue an order permitting Mr. Gupta to resume the deposition of Mr. Blankfein on the subject of his preparation for deposition in two recent sessions with the presecutors and the SEC. (ab)
March 2, 2012 Filing 44 Letter addressed to Judge Jed S. Rakoff from Kevin P. McGrath dated 3/1/2012 re: Counsel for the Plaintiff writes even if Gupta's failure to contact the Court promptly is not deemed a technical waiver, his failure to set aside time to cover any follow-up questions should preclude him from re-calling Mr. Blankfein to testify beyond the time allotted. (ab)
March 2, 2012 Filing 43 Letter addressed to Judge Jed S. Rakoff from David S. Frankel dated 3/1/2012 re: Counsel for the Defendant writes to submit that the Government should review the SEC's notes and memos of the 44 joint interviews and produce to the defense any BRADY material contained within them. (ab)
March 2, 2012 Filing 42 Letter addressed to Judge Jed S. Rakoff from John P. Henderson dated 3/1/2012 re: Counsel for the Plaintiff writes to request that the Court deny Guptas request for production of information contained in the SEC's attorney work product notes and memoranda. (ab)
February 27, 2012 Filing 41 Letter "Brief" addressed to Judge Jed S. Rakoff from Kevin P. McGrath dated 2/23/2012 re: Accordingly, the SEC respectfully requests that the Court otherwise deny Gupta's request for production of information contained in the SEC's attorney work product notes and memoranda Document filed by United States Securities and Exchange Commission.(djc)
February 27, 2012 Filing 40 Letter addressed to Judge Jed S. Rakoff from David S. Frankel dated 2/23/2012 re: For the reasons stated, we respectfully submit that any Brady material contained within the SEC's interview notes or memos should be produced to the defense. Document filed by Rajat K. Gupta.(djc)
February 23, 2012 Filing 39 Letter addressed to Judge Jed S. Rakoff from Kevin P. McGrath dated 2/7/2012 re: We submit this letter pursuant to the Court's request that the Commission and Defendant Gupta brief the question whether certain internal memoranda and notes prepared by Commission attorneys in anticipation of litigation are protected from discovery in the above-referenced action pursuant to the work product privilege. It is the Commission's position that all such memoranda are protected by the work product privilege. Document filed by United States Securities and Exchange Commission.(lmb)
February 23, 2012 Filing 38 Letter addressed to Judge Jed S. Rakoff from Kevin P. McGrath dated 2/10/2012 re: On behalf of Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), we respectfully submit this letter in response to the letter of defendant Gupta dated February 9, 2012, concerning his application to compel the Commission to produce attorney work product relating to its interviews of various witnesses. Gupta's application should be denied in its entirety. Document filed by United States Securities and Exchange Commission.(lmb)
February 23, 2012 Filing 37 Letter addressed to Judge Jed S. Rakoff from David S. Frankel dated 2/9/2012 re: I am writing in support of Mr. Gupta's application to compel production of the SEC's witness interview memoranda and notes. For the reasons stated, the Court should require the SEC to produce its witness notes and memoranda. Document filed by Rajat K. Gupta.(lmb)
February 23, 2012 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff: Telephone Conference held on 2/23/2012. (jfe)
February 23, 2012 Filing 36 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 11/8/11 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days...(McGuirk, Kelly)
February 23, 2012 Filing 35 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: Conference held on 11/8/2011 before Judge Jed S. Rakoff. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Toni Stanley, (212) 805-0300. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 3/19/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/29/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/29/2012.(McGuirk, Kelly)
February 3, 2012 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff: Telephone Conference held on 2/3/2012. (djc)
January 23, 2012 Filing 34 DEMAND for Trial by Jury. Document filed by Rajat K. Gupta(Oberman, Michael)
January 20, 2012 Filing 33 ANSWER to 1 Complaint. Document filed by Rajat K. Gupta.(Oberman, Michael)
January 12, 2012 Filing 32 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 11/18/11 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days...(McGuirk, Kelly)
January 12, 2012 Filing 31 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: Conference held on 11/18/2011 before Judge Jed S. Rakoff. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Toni Stanley, (212) 805-0300. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 2/6/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 2/17/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 4/16/2012.(McGuirk, Kelly)
January 4, 2012 Filing 30 ANSWER to 1 Complaint. Document filed by Raj Rajaratnam.(White, William)
December 30, 2011 Filing 29 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 11/8/11 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days...(McGuirk, Kelly)
December 30, 2011 Filing 28 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: Conference held on 11/8/2011 before Judge Jed S. Rakoff. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Martha Drevis, (212) 805-0300. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 1/23/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 2/2/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 4/2/2012.(McGuirk, Kelly)
December 27, 2011 Filing 27 ANSWER to 1 Complaint. Document filed by Rajat K. Gupta.(Oberman, Michael)
December 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER: ORDERED that any person subject to this Order -including without limitation the parties to this action) their representatives, agents, experts and consultants, all third parties providing discovery in this action, and all other interested persons with actual or constructive notice of this Order -- shall adhere to the following terms, upon pain of contempt: Any person subject to this Order who receives from any other person any "Discovery Material" (i.e., information of any kind provided in the course of discovery in this action) that is designated as "Confidential" pursuant to the terms of this Order shall not disclose such Confidential Discovery Material to anyone else except as expressly permitted hereunder. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 12/15/2011) (djc)
December 5, 2011 Filing 25 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 11/18/11 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days...(McGuirk, Kelly)
December 5, 2011 Filing 24 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: Conference held on 11/18/2011 before Judge Jed S. Rakoff. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Toni Stanley, (212) 805-0300. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/29/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/8/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/7/2012.(McGuirk, Kelly)
November 30, 2011 Filing 23 Letter addressed to Judge Jed S. Rakoff from Kevin P. McGrath dated 11/23/2011 re: Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission joins in the arguments made in the November 23, 2011 letter of Assistant U.S. Attorney Reed Brodsky filed in response to the letter of Gary Naftalis dated November 23, 2011. (rjm)
November 30, 2011 Filing 22 Letter addressed to Judge Jed S. Rakoff from Reed Brodsky dated 11/23/2011 re: The United States Attorney's Office ("USAO") respectfully submits this response. The notion that Gupta's discovery rights in the civil case would be hindered, much less "completely scuttle[d]" (Gupta Ltr. at 1), if the Court were to stay some or all of its proposed depositions until after the criminal trial is simply untrue. (rjm)
November 30, 2011 Filing 21 Letter addressed to Judge Jed S. Rakoff from Gary P. Naftalis dated 11/23/2011 re: We write briefly to respond to the Government's letter to Your Honor, dated November 22, 2011. (rjm)
November 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER: For the reasons set forth on this Order, all depositions in this case are hereby adjourned until after the conclusion of the criminal trial in united States v. Gupta, except for the seven listed within, which can go forward prior to that criminal trial. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 11/29/2011) (ab)
November 28, 2011 Filing 19 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Raj Rajaratnam waiver sent on 10/27/2011, answer due 12/26/2011. Document filed by United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (Henderson, John)
November 23, 2011 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff: Telephone Conference held on 11/23/2011. (jfe)
November 22, 2011 ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 20 Notice of filing of Transcript. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (tro)
November 22, 2011 ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 19 Transcript. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (tro)
November 21, 2011 Filing 18 Letter addressed to Judge Jed S. Rakoff from Gary P. Naftalis dated 11/15/2011 re: Counsel for the defendant writes to submit a list of the ten persons whom they would most want to depose on behalf on Mr. Gupta based on the information currently known to them. Document filed by Rajat K. Gupta.(ft)
November 21, 2011 Filing 17 Letter addressed to Judge Jed S. Rakoff from William E. White dated 11/15/2011 re: Counsel for the defendant writes to submit a list of the first ten witnesses that they would seek to depose in this case. Document filed by Raj Rajaratnam.(ft)
November 21, 2011 Filing 16 Letter addressed to Judge Jed S. Rakoff from Kevin P. McGrath and Valerie A. Szczepanik dated 11/15/2011 re: Plaintiff hereby respectfully makes this submission regarding deposition discovery in this action. Document filed by United States Securities and Exchange Commission.(ae)
November 18, 2011 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff: Oral Argument on Motion to Stay Depositions held on 11/18/2011. (ft)
November 17, 2011 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff: Telephone Conference held on 11/17/2011. (mro)
November 16, 2011 CASHIERS OFFICE REMARK on 8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, 7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice in the amount of $400.00, paid on 11/08/2011, Receipt Number 1021389,1021390. (jd)
November 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting 8 Motion for William E. White to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 11/11/2011) (rjm)
November 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting 7 Motion for Terence J. Lynam to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 11/11/2011) (lmb)
November 11, 2011 Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by David Stanley Frankel on behalf of Rajat K. Gupta (Frankel, David)
November 11, 2011 Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Robin Marie Wilcox on behalf of Rajat K. Gupta (Wilcox, Robin)
November 11, 2011 Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Alan Roy Friedman on behalf of Rajat K. Gupta (Friedman, Alan)
November 11, 2011 Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Stewart Oberman on behalf of Rajat K. Gupta (Oberman, Michael)
November 10, 2011 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Rajat K. Gupta waiver sent on 10/27/2011, answer due 12/26/2011. Document filed by United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (Henderson, John)
November 8, 2011 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 11/8/2011. (Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/7/2012 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jed S. Rakoff. TDS 10-1-2012.) (ft)
November 8, 2011 Filing 8 MOTION for William E. White to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Document filed by Raj Rajaratnam.(bwa) (pgu).
November 8, 2011 Filing 7 MOTION for Terence J. Lynam to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Document filed by Raj Rajaratnam.(bwa) (pgu).
November 2, 2011 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Valerie Ann Szczepanik on behalf of United States Securities and Exchange Commission (Szczepanik, Valerie)
November 1, 2011 Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 11/8/2011 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 14B, U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Jed S. Rakoff, and as further set forth. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 11/1/2011) (rjm)
October 31, 2011 Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT to Judge Jed S. Rakoff. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (pgu)
October 31, 2011 Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman is so designated. (pgu)
October 31, 2011 CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:09-cv-08811-JSR. Notice of Assignment to follow. (pgu)
October 28, 2011 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Patrick Henderson on behalf of United States Securities and Exchange Commission (Henderson, John)
October 28, 2011 Filing 2 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kevin Patrick McGrath on behalf of United States Securities and Exchange Commission (McGrath, Kevin)
October 26, 2011 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rajat K. Gupta, Raj Rajaratnam. (Filing Fee $ 350.00.) Document filed by United States Securities and Exchange Commission.(ft)
October 26, 2011 CASE REFERRED TO Judge Jed S. Rakoff as possibly related to 09 Civ. 8811. (ft)
October 26, 2011 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Rajat K. Gupta, Raj Rajaratnam. (ft)
October 26, 2011 Case Designated ECF. (ft)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gupta et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: George S. Canellos
Represented By: John Patrick Henderson
Represented By: Kevin Patrick McGrath
Represented By: Valerie Ann Szczepanik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rajat K. Gupta
Represented By: David Stanley Frankel
Represented By: Alan Roy Friedman
Represented By: Gary P. Naftalis
Represented By: Michael Stewart Oberman
Represented By: Robin Marie Wilcox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raj Rajaratnam
Represented By: Terence J. Lynam
Represented By: William E. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?