Greathouse v. JHS Security Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Darnell Greathouse
Defendant: JHS Security Inc. and Melvin Wilcox
Case Number: 1:2011cv07845
Filed: November 2, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Paul A. Engelmayer
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 59 OPINION AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, the Court adopts the Report in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter a judgment in favor of Greathouse and against defendants JHS Security Inc. and Melvin Wilcox, payable join tly and severally, reflecting an award of $28,768.05 in attorneys' fees, $569.62 in costs, and an additional amount of post-judgment interest for these awards to be specified by the Clerk of Court. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. 52. The case is already closed. SO ORDERED. re: 52 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs filed by Darnell Greathouse. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 9/20/2017) (rjm)
August 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 46 OPINION & ORDER: Accordingly, finding no error, let alone clear error, the Court adopts the Report in its entirety. The Court awards Greathouse $21,450 in back pay; $21,450 in liquidated damages; $10,000 for emotional distress damages; and $10,000 in punitive damages, yielding a total sum of $62,900 in damages against defendants on the retaliation claim. For the foregoing reasons, the Court adopts Judge Gorenstein's Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The Court will enter judgment for Greathouse in a separate order. (As further set forth in this Opinion) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 8/29/2016) (kl) Modified on 8/29/2016 (kl).
October 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 OPINION & ORDER: for 26 Report and Recommendations, For the foregoing reasons, the Court adopts Judge Gorenstein's Report and Recommendation, with the exception of his findings as to the amount of liquidated damages and the number of workweeks for which Greathouse was unpaid. Judgment in Greathouse's favor will be entered in a separate Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 10/19/2012) (ama)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Greathouse v. JHS Security Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darnell Greathouse
Represented By: Penn Ueoka Dodson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JHS Security Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melvin Wilcox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?