Flores v. Jade Doe/Melvin Hollins et al
| Edison Flores |
| Jade Doe/Melvin Hollins and John Doe/Eric T. Schneiderman |
| 1:2011cv07977 |
| November 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Genesee |
| Loretta A. Preska |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the petition is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust its sole claim. Because Flores has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, appellate review is not warran ted. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Tankleff v. Senkowski, 135 F.3d 235, 241 (2d Cir. 1998). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 191 5(a)(3), the Court further finds that any appeal of this Opinion and Order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to dismiss the petition and close the case. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 4/17/2014) (tn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
