Fleisher et al v. Phoenix Life Insurance Company
| Martin Fleisher and Jonathan Berck |
| Phoenix Life Insurance Company |
| 1:2011cv08405 |
| November 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 45 Motion to Compel. For the reasons set forth above, the plaintiffs' motion to compel Towers Watson to produce the documents identified in the subpoena for documents due July 23, 2012 (Docket no. 45) is granted, provided that the plaintiffs pay the costs incurred by Towers Watson with the exception of review costs.(Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 1/3/2013) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ago)
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, the plaintiffs' motion to compel (Docket no. 42) is granted to the extent that Phoenix shall complete the production of documents responsive to the Plaintiffs' First Document Request by February 28, 2013. Phoenix's application to shift the costs of that production to the plaintiffs is denied. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 12/27/2012) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ago) (Main Document 72 replaced on 12/28/2012) (cd).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
