Securities and Exchange Commission v. Alternative Green Technologies, Inc. et al
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Alternative Green Technologies, Inc., Mitchell Segal, Belmont Partners, LLC, Joseph Meuse, Howard Borg, David Ryan, Vikram Khanna and Panascope Capital Inc. |
| Sierra Range Holdings, Inc., Senior Capital Services, Inc., Law Office of Mitchell Segal, P.C. and Thomas Russo |
| 1:2011cv09056 |
| December 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Deborah A. Batts |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
OPINION AND ORDER re: 62 MOTION for Judgment Ordering Disgorgement, Prejudgment Interest and Civil Penalties against Defendants Alternative Green Technologies, Inc. and Mitchell Segal and Ordering Disgorgement against Relief Defendants Sie rra Range Holdings, Inc., Senior filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. For the foregoing reasons herein, the SEC's motion for final judgment is GRANTED. All disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties shall be paid as set forth herein, as well as in accordance with the Order of Final Judgment issued in conjunction with this Opinion. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion [Dkt. No. 62]. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 12/15/2014) (kgo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
