Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Dejil Systems Inc.
Plaintiff: Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund and The New York City and Vicinity Carpenters Labor-Management Corporation
Defendant: Dejil Systems Inc.
Case Number: 1:2012cv00005
Filed: January 3, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Richard J. Holwell
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: the arbitration Award is CONFIRMED, with interest to accrue at the rate of 5.25% from the date of the Award to the date judgment is entered in this matter. Petitioners' request for attorney's fees and cost s (Pet. at 4; Docket No. 11) is GRANTED. Petitioners are directed to submit a proposed Judgment consistent with this opinion to the Orders and Judgments Clerk of this Court by September 10, 2012. Respondent may submit any objections to the proposed Judgment on or before September 17, 2012. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 8/29/2012) (pl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Dejil Systems Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund
Represented By: Richard Brian Epstein
Represented By: Charles R. Virginia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund
Represented By: Richard Brian Epstein
Represented By: Charles R. Virginia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The New York City and Vicinity Carpenters Labor-Management Corporation
Represented By: Richard Brian Epstein
Represented By: Charles R. Virginia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dejil Systems Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?