The Rice Company v. Precious Flowers LTD et al
| The Rice Company |
| Precious Flowers LTD and The Government Of Peru |
| 1:2012cv00497 |
| January 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Richard J. Holwell |
| Marine |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 4 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
OPINION AND ORDER: Because TRC has failed to show that an exercise of the Courts discretion is warranted under these circumstances, its application for a stay is denied. Furthermore, because the Courts resolution of TRCs application for a stay casts considerable doubt on the continued viability of its petition to consolidate, the Court invites TRC to submit a memorandum of law, not to exceed 10 pages, by June 15, 2012, showing cause why the petition should not be denied and the case dismissed su a sponte. If TRC fails to file a memorandum of law, the petition will be denied and the case dismissed sua sponte without further notice to the parties. If TRC does file a memorandum of law, Precious Flowers shall have until June 22, 2012, to file a reply, not to exceed 10 pages. Finally, in light of the foregoing, the status conference scheduled for June 13, 2012, is hereby canceled and the parties are no longer required to submit status letters to the Court by June 8, 2012. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 6/5/2012) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
