Kelly v. USA

Kelly v. USA

Petitioner:	Thomas M. Kelly
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	1:2012cv00628
Filed:	January 24, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	Denise L. Cote
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 18, 2013	Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as to Thomas M. Kelly. The motion for reconsideration of this Court's August 20, 2013 Order is denied. As Kelly has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealabili ty will not be issue...The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 USC Section 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.... (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 11/18/2013) Copies Mailed By Chambers to Thomas M. Kelly. (gr)
July 25, 2012	Filing 9 OPINION & ORDER. Kelly's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. In addition, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Kelly has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a federal right, and appellate review is t herefore not warranted. Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). The Court also finds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). The Clerk of Court shall dismiss this petition and close the case. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 7/25/2012) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (lmb)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 18, 2013

Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as to Thomas M. Kelly. The motion for reconsideration of this Court's August 20, 2013 Order is denied. As Kelly has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealabili ty will not be issue...The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 USC Section 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.... (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 11/18/2013) Copies Mailed By Chambers to Thomas M. Kelly. (gr)

July 25, 2012

Filing 9 OPINION & ORDER. Kelly's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. In addition, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Kelly has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a federal right, and appellate review is t herefore not warranted. Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). The Court also finds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). The Clerk of Court shall dismiss this petition and close the case. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 7/25/2012) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (lmb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kelly v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Thomas M. Kelly
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?