Topever Corporation v. The Ene Group, LLC et al
| Topever Corporation |
| The Ene Group, LLC, The Underground Group LLC, Marvin Jemal and John Does I-X |
| 1:2012cv00869 |
| February 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Harold Baer |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
OPINION & ORDER: re: 24 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. filed by The Ene Group, LLC, The Underground Group LLC, 40 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Joinder in Motion). filed by Sally Jemal, Robert Grossman., M otions terminated: 40 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Joinder in Motion). filed by Sally Jemal, Robert Grossman, 24 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. filed by The Ene Group, LLC, The Underground Group LLC. For the reasons stated above, ENE and TUG's motion with respect to the fraud in the inducement and the constructive trust claims against TUG is GRANTED and their motion with respect to the fraudulent conveyance claim against TUG and ENE, as well as the contract, account stated, and unjust enrichment claims against TUG are DENIED. Defendants Sally Jemal and Robert Grossman's motion is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to close the two motions and remove them from my docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Harold Baer on 3/06/2013) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
