Cha v. Kinross Gold Corporation et al
| Bo Young Cha |
| Kinross Gold Corporation, Tye W. Burt, Paul H. Barry, Glen Masterman and Kenneth G. Thomas |
| 1:2012cv01203 |
| February 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
OPINION & ORDER re: 59 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 58 Memorandum & Opinion. filed by Kenneth G. Thomas, Paul H. Barry, Kinross Gold Corporation, Tye W. Burt, Glen Masterman. For the reasons stated above, the Court denies defendants' moti on for reconsideration in its entirety. Defendants are directed to answer the Amended Complaint within 30 days, as provided in the stipulation and order of April 8, 2013. See Dkt. 62. The Court has separately issued a case management plan today. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 6/6/2013) (djc)
|
|
Filing
58
OPINION & ORDER: For the reasons stated above: 1. Austins motion to strike is granted. Exhibits 13, 1618, 2027, and 2934 to the Giuffra Declaration are stricken from the record. 2. Kinross's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is gra nted in part and denied in part. a. Austins allegations of misstatements and omissions relating to Kinross's due diligence, and Austins allegations of misstatements and omissions relating to the schedule for development of the Tasiast mine made before August 10, 2011, are dismissed for failure to state a claim, as against all defendants. b. Austins allegations of misstatements and omissions relating to the publicly announced schedule for development of the Tasiast mine, made between Augus t 10, 2011, and the end of the Class Period, state a claim, and are not dismissed, as against all defendants. c. Austin's allegations of § 20(a) violations between August 10, 2011, and the end of the Class Period, state a claim, and are no t dismissed, as against all four Individual Defendants. The Court will hold a pretrial conference in this case on April 15, 2013, at 2:00 p.m., at which it will set a case management plan. The Court directs counsel promptly to meet and confer as to such a plan, and, by April 5, 2013, to submit a joint letter proposing such a plan, or, to the extent the parties are unable to agree, alternative such plans. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 3/22/2013)(djc) Modified on 3/22/2013 (djc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
