F.E.A., Inc. v. John Does 1-100 et al Featured Case

Plaintiff: F.E.A., Inc.
Defendant: John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company
Case Number: 1:2012cv01313
Filed: February 22, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Paul G. Gardephe
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1051
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2012 Set/Reset Hearings: Show Cause Hearing set for 3/2/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6B, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Kimba M. Wood. (ama)
February 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AMENDED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER; SEIZURE ORDER; AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSEWHY A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND SEIZURE ORDER SHOULD NOT ISSUE:At the request of Plaintiffs counsel, the Court hereby amends the Temporary Restraining Order; Seizure Order; and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue, issued earlier today, to adjourn the date for the preliminary injunction hearing to March 2, 2012 at 10 a.m. The hearing will be held before Judge Gardephe in Courtroom 6B, United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 2/23/2012) (ama)
February 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE: The Motion of Cara R. Burns, for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above caption matter is granted. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood (Part I) on 2/22/2012) (rdz)
February 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER; SEIZURE ORDER; AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND SEIZURE ORDER SHOULD NOT ISSUE: John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100, XYZ Company shall show cause as to why an order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 65, the Lanham Act 15 U.S.c. § 1051 et. seq., should not be entered granting to Plaintiff, F.E.A., Inc. a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Defendants from manufacturing, distributing, selling or holding for sale, any clothing, jewelry, photographs, posters and other merchandise (collectively the "Infringing Merchandise") bearing the federally registered trademarks, servicemarks, likenesses, logos and other indicia of the group "VAN HALEN" (collectively, the "Trademarks"). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pending hearing and determination of this application, or the expiration of fourteen (14) days from the date hereof, the Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, attorneys, successors and assigns and all persons, firms and corporations acting in concert with them, and each of them, be and hereby are temporarily restrained from manufacturing, distributing and selling InfringingMerchandise bearing the any or all of the Trademarks. Show Cause Hearing set for 2/27/2012 at 02:45 PM before Judge Paul G. Gardephe. Responses due by 2/24/2012, Replies due by 2/27/2012. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 2/22/2012) (rdz) (Main Document 3 replaced on 2/23/2012) (jar).
February 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 10/31/2011) (rdz)
February 22, 2012 Mailed notice to Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks to report the filing of this action. (rdz)
February 22, 2012 Case Designated ECF. (rdz)
February 22, 2012 Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis is so designated. (rdz)
February 22, 2012 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jane Does 1-100, John Does 1-100, XYZ Company. (rdz)
February 22, 2012 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jane Does 1-100, John Does 1-100, XYZ Company. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 465401030379)Document filed by F.E.A., Inc..(rdz) (rdz).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: F.E.A., Inc. v. John Does 1-100 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: F.E.A., Inc.
Represented By: Mark Dana Bradford
Represented By: Cara Rebecca Burns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Does 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XYZ Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?