Leapard et al v. Chan et al
| David Leapard and IMF Finance SA |
| Allen T.Y. Chan, David J. Horsley, Kai Kit Poon, Banc of America Securities LLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Sino-Forest Corporation, Ernst & Young Global Limited, Ernst & Young LLP and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated |
| 1:2012cv01726 |
| March 8, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Victor Marrero |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(i), Lead Plaintiffs hereby voluntarily dismiss the above-captioned action against the remaining defendants herein. As grounds thereof, Plaint iff states that Defendant Sino-Forest Corporation's liquidation proceedings previously pending in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has been dismissed. Lead Plaintiffs further state that no opposing party has either served an answer or a motion for summary judgment. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 12/22/2021) (kv)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER re: 79 Status Report filed by David Leapard, Myong Hyon Yoo, IMF Finance SA.. By December 1, 2021, the parties shall file a joint letter updating the Court on the status of this action, including the impact of the related Canadian litigation. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/19/2021) (kv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
