McNamara v. The Associated Press

McNamara v. The Associated Press

Plaintiff:	Dolores McNamara
Defendant:	The Associated Press
Case Number:	1:2012cv02559
Filed:	April 3, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Laura Taylor Swain
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 13, 2015	Filing 31 OPINION AND ORDER. Accordingly, for the reasons identified in my Opinion and Order dated August 21, 2014, summary judgment is granted dismissing the complaint to the extent it asserts claims under the ADEA and the NYSHRL. Because this Order resolves all remaining claims in this matter, the Clerk of the Court is directed to mark this matter closed. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 1/13/2015) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (lmb)
August 21, 2014	Filing 28 OPINION AND ORDER re: 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The Associated Press: Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, defendant's motion for summary judgment (Docket Item 17) is granted with respect to plaintiff's claims under the FLSA. Plaintiff is also granted thirty days to present evidence or otherwise show cause why summary judgment should not be granted dismissing the complaint to the extent it can be read to assert claims under the ADEA or the NYSHRL. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mark Docket Item 17 closed. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 8/21/2014) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (tn)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 13, 2015

Filing 31 OPINION AND ORDER. Accordingly, for the reasons identified in my Opinion and Order dated August 21, 2014, summary judgment is granted dismissing the complaint to the extent it asserts claims under the ADEA and the NYSHRL. Because this Order resolves all remaining claims in this matter, the Clerk of the Court is directed to mark this matter closed. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 1/13/2015) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (lmb)

August 21, 2014

Filing 28 OPINION AND ORDER re: 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The Associated Press: Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, defendant's motion for summary judgment (Docket Item 17) is granted with respect to plaintiff's claims under the FLSA. Plaintiff is also granted thirty days to present evidence or otherwise show cause why summary judgment should not be granted dismissing the complaint to the extent it can be read to assert claims under the ADEA or the NYSHRL. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mark Docket Item 17 closed. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 8/21/2014) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (tn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McNamara v. The Associated Press
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: The Associated Press
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dolores McNamara
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?