Mitchell et al v. The City of New York et al
| Melinda Mitchell and Harvey Mitchell |
| The City of New York, James Schuessler, Ricahrd Roes 1-50 and John Does 1-50 |
| 1:2012cv02674 |
| April 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Kings |
| Lewis A. Kaplan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment; 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion for summary judgement dismissing the complaint is granted and plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 1/31/2018) (anc)
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Melinda Mitchell, Harvey Mitchell, 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The City of New York, James Schuessler, Joseph Brinadze, Joseph G ulotta, Kathleen Caesar, Danielle Roventini. For the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment [DI 22] is denied. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [DI 18] dismissing the action is granted. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 2/11/2014) (lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
