Smith v. Schweiloch et al
| James Smith |
| Michael MacDougal, Wilfredo Vega, Sandra Quinones, James Lamb, Jose Moronta, Severino Concordia, Jose Criollo, Desmond Egan, John Doe Police Officer #1, John Doe Police Officer #2, John Doe Police Officer #3, John Doe Police Officer #4, John Doe Police Officer #5, John Doe Police Officer #6, John Doe Police Officer #7, The City of New York, Michael Loughran and Sol Schwartzberg, Esq |
| 1:2012cv03253 |
| April 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. Smith's motion to for reconsideration is denied. Smith&# 039;s motion for leave to amend his complaint is denied as moot. Smith's motion to certify the Court's previous Order for interlocutory appeal is denied. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No.9. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 6/15/2012) (pl)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF SERVICE. The plaintiff, currently incarcerated at the Manhattan Detention Center, filed this Complaint pro se, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, arising out of his New York County arrest on August 26, 2009. CONCLUSIO N: The Court dismisses the plaintiff's claims against ADA Schweiloch. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue a Summons as to: Sol Schwartzberg, Esq.; P.O. Michael MacDougal; P.O. Sandra Quinones; P.O. James Lamb; P.O. Jose Moronta; P.O. Michael Loughran; Det. Wilfredo Vega; Det. Severino Concordia; Det. Jose Criollo; Det. Desmond Egan and the City of New York. The plaintiff is directed to serve the Summons and Complaint upon these defendants within 120 days. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). If se rvice has not been made within the 120 days, and the plaintiff has not requested an extension of time to serve within that 120 days, the Complaint may be dismissed for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 5/19/2012) (bw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
