Youmans v. Schiro et al
| Richard Youmans |
| Dora Schiro, New York City, Michael Bloomberg, City of New York and New York City Department of Health & Hospital Corporation |
| 1:2012cv03690 |
| May 8, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| James C. Francis |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
OPINION & ORDER re: 47 MOTION to Dismiss 42 the Third Amended Complaint. filed by Jean Richards, Michael Bloomberg, Dora B. Schriro, City of New York. For the reasons articulated in Magistrate Judge Francis' Report, the Third Amended Complaint is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case and to serve this Opinion and Order on Youmans at his address of record. The parties' failure to file written objections precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008); Small v. Secy of Health & Human Servs., 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989)(per curiam). The Court therefore certifies that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 12/3/2013) (djc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
