Fredricks v. The City of New York et al
| Michael Fredricks |
| The City of New York, Prison Health Services, Prison Health Services Medical Services P.C., Jean Richard, Aslam Kadri, Samuel Okorozo, Krishnapatibandla, James Rich, Peter Wachtel, New york City Department of Correction (NYCDOC) Captain(CPT.) Richard Roe and Corrections Officer (C.O.) John Doe 1 through 25 |
| 1:2012cv03734 |
| May 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Robert W. Sweet |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
OPINION re: 18 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by Prison Health Services Medical Services P.C., The City of New York, Prison Health Services. For the foregoing reasons, the motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part, with leave granted to replead within 20 days. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 3/4/2013) (cd)
|
|
Filing
17
OPINION: #102249 re 8 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint filed by Prison Health Services Medical Services P.C., The City of New York, Prison Health Services. Based on the conclusions set forth above, Defendants' motion to dismiss is denied as moot with leave to renew. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 8/23/2012) (mt) Modified on 8/27/2012 (jab).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
